Archive | Current News

HOW TO BEAT FORECLOSURE

HOW TO BEAT FORECLOSURE
Some owners have stayed in their homes for years by repeatedly filing for bankruptcy.
St. Petersburg Times – St. Petersburg, Fla.
Author: SUSAN TAYLOR MARTIN

When his lender started to foreclose in 2003, Jeffrey DeMauro appealed for time to resolve his financial problems.

“I sincerely want to work this situation out and get back on track and save my home,” DeMauro wrote to Pinellas County court officials. “I have two children and do not want to be put out of our house and on the street.”

The DeMauros are still in foreclosure. But by declaring bankruptcy 11 times, they have managed to hang on to their house and to continue living there – seven years after they made their last regular mortgage payment.

Though an extreme example, the couple’s story is an increasingly common one among distressed Tampa Bay homeowners. Hundreds, perhaps thousands, are staying in their houses long after defaulting because they declare bankruptcy, challenge the foreclosure or simply sit back as their cases grind through an overloaded court system.

In theory, the time between the start of foreclosure and the sale of property on the courthouse steps can be as little as three months.

But in Pinellas, 485 of the 1,009 people whose homes were scheduled for auction in January and February still had ownership at least a year after foreclosure proceedings began. Another 155 had retained ownership at least two years, 19 for three years and four for six or more years.

Of Hillsborough residents facing foreclosure sales in January and February, 829 people – almost 50 percent of the total – still held title to their places a year after the bank started to foreclose. Nearly 170 had hung on for two years and 19 for four years or more.

Pinellas Circuit Judge Anthony Rondolino cautions that some of the homeowners might have walked away or deeded the property to another party.

“These are people who might appear on the tax assessor’s roll, but that doesn’t mean they’re still living in the house,” says Rondolino, who handles foreclosures. And, he adds, while “it may look like the homeowner dragged out a case for five years, it could equally be said: Why didn’t the lender do something to move this action along?”

Whatever the reason, critics say these drawn-out foreclosures are prolonging the time it will take the nation’s housing market to stabilize and recover. But others find at least one advantage to homeowners who stay put.

“On a societal basis, it’s better to have your neighbor still there and the neighborhood still stable instead of a vacant house trashed and vandalized,” says Matthew Weidner, a St. Petersburg lawyer active in the booming field of foreclosure defense.

Weidner says he can keep clients in their homes “an indeterminate time” by challenging the legality of foreclosure suits. During the real estate boom, millions of mortgages were bundled into securities and sold to investors, creating a potential nightmare when it comes to determining who has the right to foreclose.

“I’ve sat here in mediations with dadgum (lenders) saying, ‘Because of the mess in the files, you’re not going to get this house back for a year or two years,”‘ Weidner recalls. “‘And even if you get it scheduled for sale, my client will file bankruptcy.”‘

Chapter 13 of the federal bankruptcy code can be a lifeline for homeowners who have regular incomes but are struggling with mortgage payments. Filing a Chapter 13 petition automatically stops the sale of a house in foreclosure and gives the debtor as much as five years to catch up on late payments while making current ones.

Some homeowners make frequent use of the system.

DeMauro would not comment for this story. However, court records illustrate how he and his wife have clung to their home for seven years even as the amount they owe grew from $84,600 to $101,856 because of late charges.

In his 2003 letter seeking time to get a loan modification, DeMauro noted that he and his wife had “stable employment” with the Pinellas school system and were starting to emerge from an unspecified financial crisis.

“We have strived to work things out the correct way and not go the easy route of bankruptcy,” he wrote.

But in 2004, the DeMauros filed their first Chapter 13 petition just before the house was to be sold at public auction. A judge soon dismissed the case, but the sale already had been stopped.

Over the next few years, the DeMauros were in and out of bankruptcy as new sale dates were scheduled. Their 11th and most recent filing came Jan. 25 – a day before the house again was to go on the block.

Bankruptcy officials have a name for debtors like the DeMauros: “serial filers.”

“We are sensitive to serial filers and our system was set up so we could catch them right away,” says Catherine Peek McEwen, a Tampa bankruptcy judge.

Under a “three-strikes and you’re out” rule, debtors on a third filing get no relief from foreclosure if they had two cases pending in the previous year. In addition, judges are giving banks and other creditors more opportunity to request a one- or two-year ban on filings by those who seem to be abusing the system. And judges can order serial filers to appear in person and show cause why their case should not be dismissed.

“So we now actually have three methods of attack,” McEwen says. In a recent case, she told a woman on her third Chapter 13 in seven months that she couldn’t file again unless she had a lawyer.

Though homeowners can stay put for years by repeatedly declaring bankruptcy, isn’t it stressful to spend so much time and energy fighting off foreclosure?

“It’s horrible,” says Paul Stenstrom of Palm Harbor. “But this is our home, it’s not just a house.”

Stenstrom says his problems began when he lost his job in broadcasting and a company he started foundered in the post-9/11 recession. After the mortgage holder began foreclosing in 2002, the Stenstroms filed the first of what would be nine Chapter 13 petitions.

The couple want to stay in their upper middle-class community, where they are active in church and their three daughters attend good schools.The Stenstroms are optimistic they eventually will be able to repay their loan, which has swollen from $185,400 to $351,143. Sharon Stenstrom, whose work career was cut short when she was nearly killed by a drunken driver, has returned to college to get a degree in counseling. Her husband has developed an epoxy coating that he thinks will sell well once construction picks up.

To outsiders, Stenstrom knows he appears to be gaming the system by staying in a house eight years after he last made regular payments. But he says he’s only doing what he legally can to keep a roof over his family.

“I don’t like living this way so if I didn’t have any hope, I wouldn’t do it. We’ve suffered a lot of judgment from some who haven’t been through this – yet.”

Credit: Times Senior Correspondent

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction or distribution is prohibited without permission.

Posted in Current News3 Comments

High Court Unanimously Upholds Key Debtor Attorney Features of BAPCPA

In an eagerly awaited opinion, the Supreme Court today unanimously upheld the key features of BAPCPA aimed at those attorneys representing debtors in consumer cases. Milavetz, Gallop & Milavetz v. United States.  The opinion by Justice Sotomayor held that attorneys who provide bankruptcy assistance to debtors are, in fact, “debt relief agencies” under the 2005 law, and are bound to comply with BAPCPA’s other ethical and disclosure requirements. Upheld specifically was the prohibition of advising the assisted person to “incur more debt in contemplation of” filing for bankruptcy, which debtors’ counsel had argued impermissibly restricted speech and the attorney-client relationship by encompassing any advice given to a debtor with the awareness that he might soon file for bankruptcy.

The Court here read the statute in a narrower way,  concluding that BAPCPA  prohibits only advice to incur more debt “because the debtor is filing for bankruptcy, rather than for a valid purpose.” The Court found valid Congress’ stated concerns with the practice of “loading up on debt prior to filing,” and that advising a client to “incur more debt because of bankruptcy presents a substantial risk of injury to both debtors and creditors.”  The Court also found       that the challenged disclosure requirements of BAPCPA valid as applied in that they are designed at addressing misleading commercial speech, and thus were found reasonably related to the government’s interest in preventing deceptive advertising. Click here to read the Supreme Court’s ruling.

The ABI will hold a media briefing on the Supreme Court’s opinion tomorrow at 2 p.m. ET.  Participants on the call will be Joseph R. Prochaska of Prochaska Thompson Quinn & Ferraro, P.C. (Nashville, Tenn.), Prof. Nancy B. Rapoport of the William S. Boyd School of Law, University of Nevada and William H. Schorling of Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney, and ABI Resident Scholar Juliet Moringiello will be the moderator. If you would like to listen to the live teleconference, please reply to this message or contact John Hartgen at 703-894-5935 for the dial-in instructions. Due to media joining the call, the number of members looking to participate in the live teleconference at 2 p.m. tomorrow will be limited to 30, so please send your request ASAP. If you are unable to listen in, ABI will be posting an archive audio file of the teleconference in the Newsroom section of the Web site within the week.

Posted in Current News2 Comments

Foreclosure or bankruptcy: What to do?

By Liz Pulliam Weston

MSN Money

You can’t afford the payments on your home. Your efforts to get your mortgage modified are going nowhere. You may even have tried to sell the home for less than what you owe, but the short sale fell through.

Now you face some grim options.

You can let the home slide into foreclosure, or you can try to prevent or at least delay the foreclosure with a bankruptcy filing.

Here’s what you need to know to make the right decision:

Foreclosure takes a while. The amount of time between your first missed payment and the sheriff arriving to throw you out varies considerably by state, lender and even market conditions, but foreclosure doesn’t happen overnight.

Although a lender can start foreclosure proceedings after a single missed payment, most wait until three or more monthly payments have been skipped. How long the process takes after that varies widely; some Southern states give lenders the power to oust borrowers from their homes in a matter of weeks, while in other areas foreclosures are now dragging on for 12 months or more, said attorney Stephen Elias, the author of “The Foreclosure Survival Guide” (also available for free on self-help legal publisher Nolo’s Web site).

In general, foreclosures move faster in states that don’t require lenders to go to court to get the process started (”nonjudicial” foreclosures) than in states that do (”judicial” foreclosures). To see which applies in your state, visit Nolo’s “How foreclosure works” page.

Bankruptcy slows but often doesn’t halt the foreclosure process. As soon as you file for bankruptcy, creditors must stop collection efforts. Your mortgage lender can ask that the so-called automatic stay be lifted so it can proceed with foreclosure, but the amount of time you typically have before the foreclosure process recommences varies by the type of bankruptcy you file: 

  • A Chapter 13 repayment plan requires you to pay back at least some of your debts over five years.
  • A Chapter 7 liquidation erases most of your consumer debt in a few months.

“With a Chapter 7, you usually get two months” of breathing room from the foreclosure process, Elias said. “With Chapter 13, it’s usually six months.”

That is, unless you can demonstrate you’re able to pay back what you owe. In that case:

Chapter 13 can help you catch up. If your financial setback was temporary and you now have the money to make your mortgage payments and get caught up on the payments you missed, a Chapter 13 bankruptcy can save your home.

A Chapter 13 also can help you get rid of second and third mortgages, including home equity loans and lines of credit, if you no longer have the equity to secure those loans.

Unfortunately, few people are in a position to get caught up on their mortgages, Elias warns. Many who fall behind do so because their payments are too big or their income has dropped. They still can’t afford their primary home loan payments, let alone pay back the arrears they owe, even if the extra payments are stretched out over five years.

Another problem with Chapter 13: It’s expensive. Attorneys typically charge $3,000 and up to handle a repayment plan bankruptcy, which is about twice the going rate for the simpler Chapter 7 filing.

Weigh the costs and what filing buys you. Even if you can’t save your home, you may want to consider Chapter 13 just to buy yourself more time, if you can afford to do so.

The longer foreclosure takes, the more time you have to stay in your home and save money. The cash you would have been applying to your mortgage can go to a savings account to help you make a security deposit on a rental, Elias said.

Video: Foreclosure filings surge

Elias strongly believes people should stay in their homes as long as they possibly can to strengthen their finances for life in a post-foreclosure world, when credit will be tough to get.

“I get really depressed when I heard people have left their house” before they have to, Elias said.

You may not feel comfortable staying in a house you can’t pay for, of course. But if your goal is to buy more time, you can do the math to see if the extra months bankruptcy offers would allow you to save enough to make it worth the cost.

Chapter 7 may help — or it may not. A Chapter 7 liquidation won’t help you keep your home, since this type of bankruptcy erases unsecured debt, not the kind of debt that’s secured by a house.

But it could allow you to erase consumer debt, such as credit card and medical bills, in addition to slowing the foreclosure process for a couple of months. 

Chapter 7 bankruptcy isn’t a good idea if:

  • You have “nonexempt” property you want to keep. A second car or truck, vacation property, expensive jewelry and family heirlooms are among the things that can be seized and sold to pay creditors in a Chapter 7 filing.
  • Your income is too high. If your family income exceeds the median for your area, your case might be rerouted to a Chapter 13 filing.
  • You don’t want to stick a co-debtor with a debt. If you co-signed for a personal loan, for example, your obligation might be erased, but your co-signer is still responsible for the debt.

For more details, read Nolo’s “When Chapter 7 bankruptcy isn’t the right choice.”

Consider the credit implications. Bankruptcy is the worst thing you can do to your credit scores, but it has an upside. Bankruptcy can help you erase debts and get a fresh start, putting an end to the continuing damage to your credit reports from late payments.

Foreclosure, while somewhat less damaging to your credit scores, doesn’t offer relief from other debts. You also may spend longer in mortgage lenders’ penalty box than someone who has just a bankruptcy on his records.

Currently, mortgage buyer Fannie Mae makes those with foreclosures wait five years until they can get another home loan, with extra restrictions on borrowing until seven years have passed, said Matt Hackett, the senior underwriter for mortgage lender Equity Now. People with Chapter 7 bankruptcies must wait four years from the date of their discharge. Those with Chapter 13s must wait two years after their plans have been successfully completed (which typically means a seven-year total penalty period, including the five-year repayment period) or four years if their case was dismissed rather than completed. 

For Federal Housing Administration loans, the penalty period is three years for foreclosures, two years for Chapter 7s and a year after a Chapter 13 discharge.

If you have both foreclosure and bankruptcy on your record, the longer of the two applicable penalty periods will apply.

Not all lenders follow these guidelines, of course, and restrictions may loosen or tighten over time, but in general you can expect an extended wait before you buy your next home.

(A short sale, by the way, may or may not damage your credit scores as much as a foreclosure but typically gets more-lenient treatment from mortgage lenders. Fannie Mae, for example, makes short sellers wait just two years before they can get a new home loan.)

Get advice early. If bankruptcy is a possibility, consult with an experienced bankruptcy attorney as early as possible, Elias advised. It’s easy to make mistakes that could endanger your filing or your ability to get your debt erased.

 

Transferring property or money to other people could cause problems or even get your case thrown out. So could paying a debt to a family member when you owe money to other lenders.

Also, once you file, you’re committed. If you later decide you made a mistake, you can’t just back out; a judge must approve a dismissal. If the judge doesn’t, you could lose property to the trustee.

Video: Foreclosure filings surge

Elias recommended seeking out attorneys who are members of the National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys. He also recommended the “Find a Lawyer” service on Nolo’s site.

Although many attorneys offer free initial consultations, Elias warns that you may feel pressured to hire that attorney if you decide to go through with a bankruptcy filing.

“It’s better to offer to pay for an hour of their time,” Elias said. That way you can get a personalized assessment of your situation but still feel free to shop for another attorney if the chemistry isn’t right.

 Finally, keep in mind that you have plenty of company. Although this crisis may feel like the end of the world, it’s not. You can rebuild both your finances and your credit. To start learning how, read “Bounce back fast after bankruptcy.”

Liz Pulliam Weston is the Web’s most-read personal-finance writer. She is the author of several books, most recently “Your Credit Score: Your Money & What’s at Stake.” Weston’s award-winning columns appear every Monday and Thursday, exclusively on MSN Money. She also answers reader questions on the Your Money message board and helps middle-class families cope at Building a Brighter Future.

 

Posted in Current News1 Comment

U.S. Alters Disputed Immigration Rules for Police

U.S. Alters Disputed Immigration Rules for Police By RANDAL C. ARCHIBOLD

PHOENIX — Addressing one of the most contentious immigration policies in recent years, the Obama administration unveiled changes Friday in a program that allows state and local police officers enforce federal immigration law.

As promised in July, the Department of Homeland Security said it had revamped the program to focus on rooting out illegal immigrants who have committed serious crimes. The changes also require law enforcement officers enrolled in the program to abide by federal anti-discrimination law. In addition, federal officials pledged to supervise the program more closely, flag problems and field complaints from the public.

Civil libertarians and immigration advocacy groups had complained that participating police agencies had unduly made targets of immigrants who commit relatively minor offenses, like traffic violators. There have also been widespread accusations that police officers have engaged in racial profiling. Much of the criticism has been focused here in metropolitan Phoenix, where the Maricopa County sheriff has made a national name for himself with his immigration crackdown.

Some critics, including most recently several Latino members of Congress, had urged the Obama administration to drop the program because of the problems, and those opponents were little mollified by the revisions announced Friday.

But Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials, suggesting that the changes would address the troubles, said they intended to expand the program, known as 287(g) for the section of the 1996 law that authorized it.

Officials said ICE had renewed agreements with 55 state and local law enforcement agencies. An additional 12, officials said, have reached tentative agreements that, if confirmed by their local governing bodies, will increase participation in the program to 67 agencies, from the current 66. ICE also remains in negotiations with six other agencies, including one of the largest, the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department.

Six previously participating agencies, however, have withdrawn, including the Houston Police Department. Houston officials said they were wary of police officers’ acting as immigration agents and planned to enroll soon in a separate federal program that would allow all jail inmates, not just those suspected of being in the country illegally, to be screened for federal offenses, including immigration violations.

Nowhere has the 287(g) program been more controversial than in Maricopa County, where Sheriff Joe Arpaio, whose department has the largest number of personnel trained in the program, faces a Justice Department investigation over complaints of civil rights violations. Lawsuits accuse deputies of singling out Latinos for stops that include a check of their immigration status.

ICE announced Friday that it had withdrawn its authorization for the sheriff’s street enforcement of immigration law, in which 100 federally trained deputies had been engaged. But, to the ire of immigrant advocates, the federal agency will continue to allow 60 deputies to screen jail inmates, who have accounted for a vast majority of the immigration arrests.

Mr. Arpaio has denounced federal officials for the changes and conducted a crime sweep Friday in Surprise, a Phoenix suburb, as a retort, saying he could pursue illegal immigrants under state laws that bar activity like human smuggling.

“The sheriff is prone to rhetoric on occasion, and some of that is about ICE,” said John T. Morton, the agency’s director. “But I call things on the merits.”

The new agreements are the latest evolution of the program, which got under way in 1996 but did not begin to grow in earnest until after the Sept. 11 attacks. The immigration agency is requesting $68.1 million to run the program in the fiscal year that began Oct. 1.

More than 133,000 illegal immigrants have been arrested through the program since January 2006, though ICE officials said they could not readily provide information on how many had been deported.

While opponents denounce the program as ineffective and prone to abuse, its defenders say there is no reason why illegal immigrants who have committed a crime, even if not of the most serious nature, should be allowed to remain in the United States.

“Claims that the program was supposed to focus only on serious crimes are false,” said a joint statement by Representatives Trent Franks, a Republican whose district includes Maricopa County, and Lamar Smith, a Texas Republican who was an author of the 287(g) legislation. “In fact, the program was created to let state and local law enforcement officials help enforce all immigration laws, not a select few.”

The debate continued to boil here on Friday, when protesters marched on Mr. Arpaio’s downtown office, as they regularly do, around the time his crime sweep got under way 20 miles away in Surprise.

Later, at an outdoor news conference in Surprise, Mr. Arpaio said eight people suspected of being illegal immigrants had been arrested under a state statute that forbids human smuggling.

“We will continue to do what we have been doing,” he said, fighting to speak over the din of shouting protesters.

Posted in Current News1 Comment

Congress passes green-card bill for spouses of deceased U.S. citizens

Widows and widowers would now be eligible regardless of when their partners died or how long they were married. The measure awaits President Obama’s signature.

By Anna Gorman

October 21, 2009

Congress passed a bill Tuesday that would make widows and widowers of U.S. citizens eligible for green cards even if their spouses died before their applications were approved.

The measure, part of the more than $40-billion Homeland Security appropriations bill, ends the “widow penalty,” which required couples to be married for two years before the surviving spouse would be eligible to apply for residency. Now, surviving spouses can apply for a green card for themselves and their children regardless of when the U.S. citizen died or how long they were married.

There are believed to be a few hundred cases affected nationwide, including that of Dahianna Heard, whose husband was fatally shot while working for a private security contractor in Iraq; Raquel Williams, whose husband died of sleep apnea and heart problems; and Ana Maria Moncayo-Gigax, whose husband was killed in a car crash while on duty with the U.S. Border Patrol. Many are fighting deportation, and others have already been deported.

“It was just something crying out to be fixed,” said Brent Renison, who has been fighting to get the law changed since 2004. “These cases should have been approved.”

Renison had fought the case in courts around the nation, including in Los Angeles, where a judge this year ordered the Department of Homeland Security to reopen the immigration cases of nearly two dozen people who were denied green cards because of the deaths of their spouses.

In June, the federal government announced that it would suspend deportation proceedings for two years so applicants could stay in the U.S. while resolving their legal status. But Renison said that didn’t go far enough and continued to push Congress to change the law.

The bill now goes to President Obama.

anna.gorman@latimes.com

Posted in Current News1 Comment

Florida Plans Immigration Protests

Florida Plans Immigration Protests

Sunday , April 30, 2006

 

MIAMI  — 

Immigration activists planned marches, prayer and demonstrations across South Florida in honor of Monday’s National Day of Action.

But many expected fewer immigrants to attend than the more than 75,000 who attended the April 11 rally in Fort Myers. That number surprised even organizers. Activists said a few immigrants lost their jobs after that march, and many were concerned about recent Homeland Security immigration raids, in which hundreds of immigrants were rounded up.

In West Palm Beach, organizers decided to lead a march Sunday instead of Monday to ensure immigrants working in the booming construction and resort industry would not have to miss work.

“We have received a number of people who were being threatened by their employers that they would be fired if they didn’t come, so we changed it,” said Carlos Cisneros, of the Guatemalan Maya Quetzal Organization, which has helped sponsor the event.

“We’re not officially coordinating a work stoppage. We are leaving it up to every individual. We don’t want people to lose a job, but we want to encourage people to stand up for their rights,” said Maria Rodriguez, head of the Florida Immigrant Coalition.

Activists in Fort Lauderdale were organizing a day of prayer followed by a rally. In Sarasota, demonstrators planned to join arms across the Ringling Bridge, and in Miami activists planned to gather at the Orange Bowl. Other groups planned events in Belle Glade, Fort Pierce and Tampa.

Yolanda Delmontes, 36, who came to the United States illegally eight years ago was among those who planned to march Monday in Homestead.

“We are afraid, but we have to come out and make our voice heard,” said the Mexican native.

Ray Gilmer, spokesman for the Florida Fruit and Vegetable Association, said the timing of the protests was tough for growers in the area, as the Valencia juice oranges are in full harvest. A recent heat-wave has also meant vegetables are ripening more quickly and can’t sit on the vine.

But Gilmer added that if the walkout helps call attention to the need for an improved guest worker program, “one day of lost production is worth the political momentum that might come from it.”

A. Duda & Sons Inc. and Taylor & Fulton Farms both agreed to give workers the day off Monday.

Fear instilled by recent immigration raids has actually made employers more sympathetic toward workers, said Homestead activist Jonathan Fried. He said several plant nurseries in the area were planning to remain closed Monday.

“People are determined to do something about the immigration laws. They are fighting for their rights as human beings,” he said.

While, a growing number of immigration activists are worried that the May 1 marches could spark more backlash, they believe in the end the positive effect is worth it.

Spanish-language radio stations warned participants not to take alcohol to the march.

“Some people instinctively have a negative reaction to things of that sort,” said political analyst and immigration reform advocate, Ana Navarro.

But she added, “Marches and protests have been effective in the past, and I’m sure opinions of them were divided then too. The picture of half a million people marching is a powerful image.”

Posted in Current News2 Comments

Hollywood passes property tax rate increase to eliminate budget shortfall

By Ihosvani Rodriguez

South Florida Sun-Sentinel

September 9, 2008

HOLLYWOOD

City officials on Monday passed on first reading a proposal that would raise the property tax rates slightly to avoid a $14 million budget shortfall and mass layoffs.

The proposal passed 5-2 despite outcry from residents who took turns pleading with elected officials for a financial reprieve.

Those who voted for it said the increase, which includes higher fire and sanitation fees, would still give homeowners a lower tax bill because of declining property values. About 81 employees would get to to keep their jobs.

Opponents — Mayor Peter Bober and Commissioner Heidi O’Sheehan — each said they wanted staff members to suggest further cuts before a final vote on Monday.

“It might sound like a small increase, but it’s exacerbated by the higher fees,” said Bober, before voting against it. “It’s not a ton of money but there really are a lot of people who can’t afford it.”

The commission chamber was filled with employees and union leaders, but none of them commented. Some residents took aim at some of the soaring employee costs and urged commissioners to make bold cuts to the city’s workforce of roughly 1,485.

“If you don’t have the political will to do it, you are either part of the problem, or you are incompetent and you don’t deserve the position you have,” one resident said.

Under the proposed $324 million budget, property owners will see their tax rates go up to about $6.24 for every $1,000 of taxable value, an increase from the current $5.95.

A flat fire fee will go from $109 to $130 for every residential unit. Sanitation fees also will go up 10 percent each year for the next five years.

The measures would result in 26 vacant position being slashed, but nobody would lose their current jobs. It also means the owner of a $292,000 homestead home would see a savings of about $11 in city taxes, instead of the $49 under the current rate.

Ihosvani Rodriguez can be reached at ijrodriguez@sunsentinel.com or 954-385-7908.

Copyright © 2009, South Florida Sun-Sentinel

Posted in Current News2 Comments